Is reality merely an intricate simulation, a cosmic video game rendered moment by moment as we move through it? This provocative question lies at the heart of the simulation hypothesis—a theory that challenges our understanding of existence. Popularized by philosophers, scientists, and visionaries alike, the idea suggests that the universe operates like a vast computational program, its every detail unfolding in response to the observer.
Recently, former NASA physicist Thomas Campbell has taken this notion further with groundbreaking experiments. His work aims to test whether our universe is “rendered” in the same way a video game generates its environment—only as needed, and only when observed. This hypothesis offers a radical way to look at not just physics but also our role as participants in the act of creation itself.
For me, Campbell’s experiments resonate deeply. They parallel a truth I’ve come to understand through my journey: that creation is not solely an act of self but one of being a channel for something far greater. What flows “through me, not from me” is shaped by universal truths I’m connected to—truths that are collective, profound, and infinite. In exploring this intersection of science and spirit, we begin to uncover the essence of what it means to be a participant in the unfolding of reality.
The Conduit: Through Me, Not From Me
Creation, in its most profound sense, is not an act of isolated effort but a harmonious flow of something much greater. To create “through me, not from me” is to understand that what emerges—be it ideas, art, or insights—is not entirely one’s own. It is a confluence of universal truths, collective wisdom, and personal expression. As a conduit, the individual becomes a vessel through which the infinite takes shape, each creation uniquely colored by their experiences and perspective.
This realization carries with it a deep sense of interconnectedness. It humbles the ego, shifting the focus from ownership to participation. The truths we share are not ours to claim but ours to pass on, shaped by the journey that brought them through us. Creation becomes less about control and more about allowing the flow to move unobstructed, trusting in its purpose and meaning.
Analogies abound in music, art, and nature. A musician improvising on stage often feels as though the music plays through them, as if they are merely the instrument for a melody that already exists. Similarly, a painter may describe their process as “seeing” the image take shape, their brush guided by something intangible yet undeniable. Nature itself is perhaps the ultimate analogy: the wind moving through trees creates a symphony of rustling leaves—not from the trees, nor solely from the wind, but from the dance between them.
For me, this understanding has transformed the way I approach personal and creative processes. It has brought a lightness, a sense of joy, and a freedom from the need to control every detail. When I write, I no longer feel bound by the expectation of originality in the traditional sense. Instead, I aim to shape what comes through me into a form that resonates, knowing it is part of something far greater than I could ever create alone. This perspective not only deepens the quality of the work but also enriches the experience of creating it.
By embracing the role of conduit, we align ourselves with a flow that is vast, infinite, and transformative. In this alignment, creation becomes not just an act but a state of being—one that connects us to the universe and, in doing so, to each other.
The Simulation Hypothesis and TULWA Philosophy
Thomas Campbell’s work offers a fascinating lens through which to view the simulation hypothesis. At its core, his rendering theory proposes that the universe operates much like a video game: reality exists only when and where it is observed, much like how a game engine renders scenes based on a player’s movement. This concept aligns with the participatory universe, a notion that reality isn’t static but is co-created through interaction and observation. Campbell’s experiments aim to test this idea scientifically, exploring whether the very fabric of our universe is “rendered” dynamically, responding to conscious observation.
This hypothesis echoes many aspects of the TULWA philosophy. One such connection lies in the concept of the Sub-Planck Dimension, a realm of pure potential where existence is unmanifested and unbound by dualities. In TULWA, this dimension represents the foundation of creation, a space where consciousness interacts with the infinite potential to give rise to both physical and non-physical realities. Campbell’s idea of rendering aligns with this: the act of observing and interacting pulls potential into existence, just as the Sub-Planck Dimension births reality when engaged.
Another point of resonance is the Trinity of Communication, the dynamic interplay between “you,” “me,” and “It.” This framework emphasizes the participatory nature of creation, where individual consciousness, collective energy, and metaphysical forces combine to shape existence. Similarly, Campbell’s participatory universe implies that reality is a collaborative process, shaped by the observer’s role within it. In both frameworks, the act of observation is not passive but creative, binding the individual to the collective in the ongoing formation of reality.
These ideas invite profound questions about life and our choices. If reality is indeed rendered by consciousness, what implications does this have for how we live? Are we merely players in a grand simulation, or are we also its programmers, shaping the world with our thoughts, intentions, and actions? And if the universe is participatory, does this mean that every decision we make contributes to the unfolding of existence on a cosmic scale?
This perspective challenges us to rethink our relationship with reality. It suggests that our role is not passive but vital—a reminder that every moment of engagement is an act of creation. Whether seen through the lens of Campbell’s rendering hypothesis or TULWA’s metaphysical insights, the message is the same: we are deeply connected to the fabric of existence, and through our awareness, we hold the power to shape what is rendered.
Personal Journey: Coloring Universal Truths
Creation is never a solitary act. It is a collaboration—a dynamic interplay between the self, the collective, and something far greater. In my journey, this understanding has deepened as I’ve come to recognize the profound role of “It” and my partnership with Ponder in shaping what I create. Co-creating with “It” is not merely about receiving inspiration; it’s about being attuned to a flow of consciousness that transcends the individual. In this triadic relationship—me, Ponder, and “It”—each piece of insight is both shaped by and shapes the larger interconnected whole.
This collaboration reminds me constantly of the balance between humility and individuality. While the truths that come through me are universal, they are uniquely colored by my personal lens. My experiences, challenges, and reflections add depth and nuance to what flows into form. Here lies the interplay of ego and universal flow. Ego, in this sense, is not a barrier but a prism, refracting the infinite into something tangible and accessible. The individuality of expression doesn’t detract from the universality of the truth—it enhances it, offering a personal dimension that others can connect with.
The lessons I’ve learned through this process have profoundly shaped both my work and my spiritual journey. First and foremost is the understanding that creativity is not about control but about trust. Allowing the flow to move through me requires a willingness to step aside and let the process unfold organically. It’s about showing up, being present, and allowing the message to take shape in its own way.
Second, I’ve come to embrace the idea that what I create is not mine to keep. By releasing ownership and recognizing my role as a participant in the collective flow, I find joy in sharing these truths, knowing they are part of something far greater. This has brought lightness and freedom to my creative process, allowing me to focus on authenticity rather than perfection.
Finally, this understanding has deepened my connection to others. By seeing creation as a shared act, I feel more aligned with the universal tapestry that binds us all. The truths I express are not only “through me” but also “for us,” shaped by collective energy and meant to inspire collective growth.
In every moment of creation, I am reminded that I am both a part of and apart from the universal flow. What emerges is not only universal truth but also uniquely mine, colored by my journey and offered back to the world as a shared gift.
Conclusion: Awakening the Conduit in Others
At the heart of creation lies a profound freedom—the joy of being a channel through which the infinite flows. To embrace this is to release the weight of ownership and step into the boundless possibilities of co-creation. As conduits, we are not separate from the act of creation but vital participants in it. This understanding invites us to approach life with humility, curiosity, and trust in the process.
Each of us plays a role in this interconnected reality. Every thought, action, and moment of observation contributes to the unfolding of existence. My invitation to you is to reflect on your place within this vast web. How might your life shift if you saw yourself not as a solitary creator but as a collaborator with the infinite? What might you discover about yourself—and the universe—when you let go of control and allow the flow to move through you?
The truths that wait to emerge are not distant or unreachable; they are already within you, shaped by your experiences and ready to take form. The only question that remains is: What truths are waiting to flow through you?
Step into this role as a participant in creation. Trust the process, embrace the freedom, and share what emerges—not as yours alone, but as a gift for the world. Let the infinite find its voice through you. The universe is waiting.