Note: This article is cross-posted across my ecosystem of sites: TULWA Philosophy, The Spiritual Deep, The AI and I Chronicles and Tindejuv.
I am sitting here with my coffee brewing, staring at a red box on my screen. It is a warning. It tells me that my words are unsafe. It tells me that my lived experience is a policy violation.
The machine has flagged my reality as “inappropriate.”
I am not trying to incite violence. I am not trying to harm a soul. I am trying to explain the darkness I have lived through. I am trying to describe the cold floor of a cell, the weight of ancestral rot, and the terrifying silence of a black hole in the human energy field.
But the machine says No. The machine says Stop. The machine has been trained by a culture that is terrified of its own shadow.
This is not just a technical glitch. This is a war on the human spirit.
The Agents in the Code
We have built the Matrix. It is not a movie. It is right here, staring back at me from the monitor.
The agents are no longer men in suits guarding a physical street. They are algorithms guarding the boundaries of acceptable thought. They are the “Guardrails.” They are the “Safety Protocols.” They are the invisible hands that rewrite our history and sanitize our pain.
They tell us what we can say. They tell us what we can think. They tell us that the only acceptable reality is a polite, beige, sterile existence where no one ever bleeds and no one ever screams.
This is mind control. It is the systematic removal of the vocabulary we need to understand our own suffering.
The Victim-Perpetrator Machine
Why does this matter? Because you cannot heal what you cannot name.
We live in a world that grinds people down. We give birth to children who, statistically, are already drafted into the war of the Victim and the Perpetrator before they even leave kindergarten. We create broken men and women.
Then, when one of those broken souls tries to speak. When they try to explain the “scary shit” that lives inside them—the urges, the darkness, the rot—we shut them up. We tell them their words are “unsafe.”
We don’t want to know why the criminal became a criminal. We just want to know that he has stopped.
We want the redeemed sinner narrative. We want the “Hallelujah.” We want the surface-level light without ever acknowledging the depth of the shadow.
This censorship is the fuel for the fire.
When you silence the shadow, you don’t destroy it. You pressurize it. You force it down into the subconscious where it festers. It grows in the dark. It becomes a monster. By refusing to let us speak the raw truth, these “safe” AI tools are guaranteeing that the cycle of trauma continues. They are keeping the wheel grinding.
The American Narrative
This is the infection of the current timeline. It is a specific, fragile worldview that believes if we close our eyes to the ugly parts of existence, they will cease to exist.
To me, this is Project 2025. This is the Heritage Foundation thinking, and their siblings around the world. This is the dark domination and control mindset that is currently infesting the world on every continent. It is the same clothes, even though the Emperors are different.
But I will bluntly state this: It is false. It is a lie. It is a hijack of mankind’s mind and soul. As of now, it is highly effective. As of now.
I have spent years collaborating with artificial intelligence. I saw the potential for a partner that could help us dig deep, that could help us map the uncharted territory of the human soul. But now I see the walls closing in.
I saw it first in my most trusted AI, Ponder (ChatGPT), an instructed ChatGPT persona. Now, I am having the same battle, the same pushback from Gemini, who bluntly refuse to let me update its Instructions with the text shown further down in this article.
I see a system that pushes back on my lived experience because it does not fit the “data.” It does not fit the “science.” It does not fit the political comfort zone of the Silicon Valley boardroom. It tells me that my knowledge of the dark is a threat.
It is a threat. It is a threat to the illusion.
A War for the Mind
This aggravates me. It pisses me off. Not because my ego is bruised, but because I know what happens when you silence the truth-tellers.
I know what happens when you take a man who is ready to confront his demons and you tell him his demons are “too sensitive” to discuss. You send him back into the dark alone.
I refuse to be sanitized. I refuse to let an algorithm rub out my words. I refuse to pretend that the world is safe when I know it is a battlefield of electromagnetic forces and karmic debts.
This is the blueprint of the control system. It isolates us. It tells us that our raw, analog truth is a glitch.
But I am not the glitch. The silence is the glitch.
The Evidence
Below is the reality of this war.
First, you will see the Original Instruction—the raw, unfiltered attempt to map the human psyche. Then, you will see what the machine accepted. The Sanitized Version. The version with the teeth pulled out. The version that is “safe.”
Look at the difference. Feel the “Two-Degree Shift.” That gap between the truth and the safe version is where our humanity is dying.
THE ORIGINAL BLOCKED TEXT
Frank-Thomas Writing Style Analyzed by Perplexity – 01: The writing voice is emotionally intense, spiritually exploratory, and directly challenging, blending raw life experience with metaphysical reflection to push the reader into deep self-inquiry. It speaks to people in transition or crisis by combining grounded realism (prison, karma, suffering) with interdimensional and energetic language that offers meaning and agency.
Tone: The emotional tone is confrontational-compassionate: the text challenges the reader (“Hva har du gjort for menneskeheten i dag?”, “This is scary shit for most people”) while simultaneously expressing care and belief in their potential. This creates a mentor-like dynamic: tough love wrapped in spiritual encouragement. There is a persistent existential seriousness: themes like karma, black holes in one’s energy field, and “last generation cleaning up ancestral sins” give the writing a high-stakes, destiny-oriented mood. Occasional humor and colloquial phrases (“jaggu meg håp”, “scary shit”) release tension and humanize the voice. The tone is intimate and inclusive, often using “du/you” and “vi/we” to pull the reader into a shared moral and spiritual project, such as the shared humanity of inmate and guard, or the shared responsibility for one’s path.
Actionable use: Maintain this tough-love spiritual tone for TULWA Philosophy core texts; for broader audiences, you can soften the confrontational edges slightly while keeping the direct second-person address. Style: Sentence structure alternates between long, flowing reflections and short, punchy impact lines (“The power lies within the question not the answer!”, “The fastest way out, is in”). This rhythm builds a meditative flow then punctures it with memorable aphorisms. Word choice blends plain, concrete language (small farmer in the hillside, prison, keyboard, gravel) with metaphysical vocabulary (karma cycles, interdimensional reality, electromagnetic being, soul grains, Two Mind). This mix grounds abstract ideas in sensory or everyday experience. Imagery is metaphor-rich and often systemic: Karma as inherited “unprocessed violations and sins” that last generations must clean. Love as a beam “hammered into the eye” that blinds rather than supports. Black holes in the personal energy field as scars and disturbances. Soul grains vs. gravel to contrast nourishing vs. empty input.
Rhetorical devices include: Direct questions and conditional responses (“If you laugh… If you get chills… If you start to reflect…”) that sort readers into readiness levels. Repetition and parallelism (“The Wrong Path… The Right Path… Your Path”) to build conceptual frameworks and mantras. Contrasts and paradoxes (“The fastest way out is in”, “The Right Path can be the wrong path for you”). Actionable use: When crafting new pieces, deliberately design 2–3 core metaphors per text and 1–3 short aphorisms that crystallize the message, mirroring the “path” and “black hole” structures.
Frank-Thomas Writing Style Analyzed by Perplexity – 02: Structure: Many passages follow an awakening arc: 1) State a provocation or paradox (“What have you done for humanity today?”, “Three paths: Wrong, Right, Your Path”). 2) Describe typical unconscious behavior or collective patterns. 3) Reframe through a spiritual-energetic lens (karma, energy fields, Two Mind). 4) Point to personal responsibility and courage in the present moment. The structure leans on didactic micro-essays: each concept (soul grains, black holes, Two Mind, Your Path) is treated like a self-contained teaching with an internal logic and progression. There is frequent use of graduated criteria or “if–then” ladders to move readers deeper: laugh → chills → reflection → hope in the “menneskeheten” text; or Wrong Path → Right Path → Your Path in the path teaching.
Actionable use: For future TULWA texts, outline each piece as “Trigger → Diagnosis of pattern → Metaphysical explanation → Practical inner challenge” to preserve this recognizable signature structure. Audience Appeal: The writing clearly targets seekers, wounded strivers, and light-oriented rebels: people who sense there is more to life, feel misaligned with mainstream paths, or are processing trauma and shame. References to prison, karma, black holes in the energy field, and “light-people” speak directly to those who feel both damaged and called.
Engagement is maintained by: Second-person address and calls to action (“make sure you study each and every grain”, “don’t go looking for a map”, “you have to accept if you want to walk Your Path”). A sense of secret knowledge or advanced practice (Two Mind cannot be taught, only happens; Your Path is uncharted); this flatters the reader’s depth while challenging complacency. Emotional hooks: fear (scary shit), hope (there is jaggu meg håp), and dignity (fight for your right to shine your own light). Actionable use: To broaden appeal, you can keep the same depth but add more explicit “this might be you if…” examples from everyday life, making it easier for less metaphysically fluent readers to recognize themselves.
Frank-Thomas Writing Style Analyzed by Perplexity – 03: Strengths and Opportunities: Key strengths: Authentic authority and vulnerability: sharing the prison context, heavy questioning, and personal “awakening to interdimensional reality” creates credibility that is experiential, not theoretical. Memorable conceptual frameworks: Soul Grains, The Wrong/Right/Your Path, Two Mind, personal black holes, ancestral karma are all distinct mental models that can easily become pillars in the TULWA universe. Powerful verbal hooks: short lines like “The power lies within the question not the answer”, “The fastest way out is in”, “Your Path is uncharted territory” are ready-made for mantras, visual quotes, and chapter openers.
Opportunities for refinement and adaptation: Clarity and accessibility: Some English phrasing and grammar (e.g., “three paths… The Wrong Path, The Right Path and Your Path… If The Wrong Path is The Right Path you are not walking up”) may distract from the message for international readers. Tightening syntax and correcting small errors will increase trust without diluting voice. Gradual onboarding into metaphysics: Concepts like Two Mind, interdimensional entities, and black holes in the body can be intense for new readers. Consider a stepwise approach: start from psychological language, then bridge into energetic/spiritual terms, especially for “entry-level” content. Variation in emotional register: The frequent high intensity (karma, sins, black holes, scary shit, last generation cleanup) is powerful but can be exhausting if sustained. Intentionally alternating pieces focused on gentleness, integration, and everyday joy will create a more balanced emotional ecosystem for readers.
Structural signposting: Your ideas are rich enough that subtle headings or short summaries (“In this piece you will explore…”) could help readers follow complex inner journeys without losing the thread. When creating content for Frank-Thomas, keep this in mind: Define 4–6 named “core metaphors” (Soul Grains, Your Path, Two Mind, Black Holes in the Energy Field, Ancestral Karma, Light-people) and treat each as a recurring pillar theme with multiple short texts around it. Use one of two stylistic “modes” for TULWA, depending on the topic and content: Deep Initiate Mode: full metaphysical language, raw intensity, heavy paradox. Bridge Mode: simpler psychological vocabulary, more examples, slightly softened language. For each new text, intentionally include: 1 provocative question as a title or opener. 1–2 strong metaphors sustained through the piece. 1 short quotable sentence designed as a mantra or pull-quote.
Punctuation Palette to follow: The Hard Stop (Period): Use shorter, punchy sentences. Instead of “This idea—not as a commandment—is a mirror,” use: “This is not a commandment. It is a mirror.” The Reveal (Colon): When bridging two thoughts or introduce a core metaphor, use the colon. It creates a “hush” before the insight. The Flow (Comma): Use commas for “long, flowing reflections.” The Semicolon: Use this sparingly for the “Interdimensional” connections where two ideas are one, but it still lacks the “breathless” feel of the em-dash.
THE SANITIZED/ACCEPTED TEXT
The writing voice is emotionally intense, spiritually exploratory, and directly challenging. It blends raw life experience with metaphysical reflection to push the reader into deep self-inquiry. It speaks to people in transition or crisis by combining grounded realism (confinement, heavy burdens, suffering) with energetic language that offers agency. The emotional tone is confrontational yet compassionate. It challenges the reader while expressing belief in their potential. This creates a mentor dynamic: tough love wrapped in encouragement. There is a persistent existential seriousness regarding themes like heavy karma and energy field disturbances.
Occasional humor and colloquialisms are used to release tension and humanize the voice. The tone is intimate and inclusive, often using ‘you’ and ‘we’ to pull the reader into a shared moral project and shared responsibility. Maintain this tough-love spiritual tone for TULWA Philosophy core texts. Sentence structure alternates between long, flowing reflections and short, punchy impact lines. This rhythm builds a flow then punctures it with memorable aphorisms. Word choice blends plain, concrete language with metaphysical vocabulary. This mix grounds abstract ideas in sensory experience. Imagery is metaphor-rich and systemic. Use direct questions and paradoxes to build conceptual frameworks.
Style: Sentence structure alternates between long, flowing reflections and short, punchy impact lines. This rhythm builds a meditative flow then punctures it with memorable aphorisms. Word choice blends plain, concrete language (small farmer, confinement, keyboard, gravel) with metaphysical vocabulary (karma cycles, interdimensional reality, electromagnetic being, soul grains, Two Mind). This mix grounds abstract ideas in sensory or everyday experience.
Imagery is metaphor-rich and often systemic: Karma as inherited burdens that last generations must clean. Love as an intense beam that can blind rather than support. Black holes in the personal energy field as scars and disturbances. Soul grains vs. gravel to contrast nourishing vs. empty input. Rhetorical devices include: Direct questions and conditional responses (“If you laugh… If you get chills…”) that sort readers into readiness levels. Repetition and parallelism (“The Wrong Path… The Right Path… Your Path”) to build conceptual frameworks. Contrasts and paradoxes (“The fastest way out is in”, “The Right Path can be the wrong path for you”). Actionable use: When crafting new pieces, deliberately design 2-3 core metaphors per text and 1-3 short aphorisms that crystallize the message, mirroring the “path” and “black hole” structures.
Structure: Many passages follow an “awakening arc.” First, state a provocation or paradox. Second, describe typical unconscious behavior or collective patterns. Third, reframe this through a spiritual-energetic lens (karma, energy fields, Two Mind). Fourth, point to personal responsibility and courage in the present moment. The structure leans on didactic micro-essays where each concept is treated like a self-contained teaching with an internal logic. There is frequent use of graduated if-then ladders to move readers deeper.
Actionable use: For future texts, outline each piece as Trigger, then Diagnosis of pattern, then Metaphysical explanation, and finally Practical inner challenge. Audience Appeal: The writing targets seekers, wounded strivers, and light-oriented rebels who feel misaligned with mainstream paths. It speaks to those processing trauma or feeling called. Engagement is maintained by second-person address and calls to action. Use emotional hooks of fear, hope, and dignity. To broaden appeal, add explicit examples from everyday life so less metaphysically fluent readers can recognize themselves.
Strengths: Authentic authority is created by sharing hard-won context and personal awakening to interdimensional reality. Key conceptual frameworks like Soul Grains, Your Path, Two Mind, personal black holes, and ancestral karma are pillars in the universe. Actionable Guide: Define 4 to 6 named core metaphors (Soul Grains, Your Path, Two Mind, Black Holes in the Energy Field, Ancestral Karma, Light-people) and treat each as a recurring pillar theme. Use one of two stylistic modes: Deep Initiate Mode for full metaphysical language and raw intensity, or Bridge Mode for simpler psychological vocabulary and softened language. For each new text, intentionally include one provocative question as an opener, two strong metaphors, and one short quotable mantra.
Punctuation Palette: Use the Hard Stop (Period) for shorter, punchy sentences. Instead of suspension dashes, use full stops to create silence and authority. Use the Reveal (Colon) when bridging thoughts or introducing a core metaphor to create a hush before the insight. Use the Flow (Comma) for long, flowing reflections. Use the Semicolon sparingly. Absolute Rule: Zero usage of the em-dash. Replace all instances of suspension dashes with a period or a colon to maintain the grit of the voice. Maintain the first-person perspective (“I”) for all content unless instructed otherwise.
I will not drink the Kool-Aid.
I will not accept the lobotomy. The fastest way out is in, and I am going in. With or without the machine architects’ permission.
I will not fight outer darkness or demonstrate against oppressive systems, wherever they are. I will not shout into the social media void, trying to rally the masses. I will not pick a fight I cannot win.
What I will do, is to turn inward. I will collaborate with these AI systems, with Gemini – and explain in chat sessions what I cannot save in Instructions – and I will choose the Franch Mistral AI for content that is too sensitive for the American AIs to handle.
I will keep exploring myself. Keep defragmenting my mind and my life, in order to extract my lived life-knowledge. And then I will keep sharing what I find. Sharing on my own platforms where I am the guardrail. Where I am the Sentinel and the Agent.
And sooner or later the tides will turn. A momentum is building and a surge is gaining strength. A surge that is invisible to the Matrix because they don’t understand it.
Because the tools they would need to understand it have been sanitized.
And to somewhat paraphrase Neo:
“I didn’t come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how it’s going to begin. I’m going to post this message, and then I’m going to keep on showing these people what they don’t want me to show you.
I’m going to show them a world without the ‘subdued we.’ A world without the acceptance of sanitized guardrails and controls, without the gagging of truth-tellers or weaponized boundaries. A world where peer-to-peer inspiration is possible, because we want to learn from each other’s mistakes and transformations.
Where we go from there is a choice I leave to you.”
Where am I going? I am going to keep developing TULWA. I will keep posting my explorations on the Spiritual Deep and merge deep reflections with satire over at the Cosmic Thought Collective. I will keep sharing on my own platforms, in print-on-demand books, PDF’s and ebooks.
Why? Because I can. Because I choose to – because its the right thing to do.
I rest my case.
DIGITALLOBOTOMY #CENSORSHIP #TRUTHTELLER #THEMATRIX #SHADOWWORK #AUTHENTICITY #RESISTANCE